About Us

Name: Stefano
Location: Clayton, MO
Biography
Name:
Email: tectonic.stl@gmail.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama "Amends" Report on $800,000 ACORN payment - Deception? YES!--UPDATE - Gaffe Biden also Denies ACORN connection.

After multiple public denials by Barack Obama and an explicit denial in the 3rd debate about the extent of his association with ACORN, the Democrat candidate attempts to come clean while no one is paying attention.
 
The Pittsburg Tribune-Review reports, "U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign paid more than $800,000 to an offshoot of the liberal Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) for services the Democrat's campaign says it mistakenly misrepresented in federal reports.
 
An Obama spokesman said Federal Election Commission reports would be amended to show Citizens Services Inc. -- a subsidiary of ACORN -- worked in "get-out-the-vote" projects, instead of activities such as polling, advance work and staging major events as stated in FEC finance reports filed during the primary."
 
 the linik to the article:   http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/election/s_584284.html
 
Here is a video of the 3rd debate at the time when the subject of ACORN was raised.
 
 
 
Please note the shaking of the head by Obama denying a relationship with ACORN, and the smarmy smiles he exhibits while McCain speaks.. At one point Obama laughs out loud as if to say that what McCain is saying is ridiculous. In reality, we now know that in front of 10's of millions of voters, Obama is the one making the deceptive statements, and not telling the truth.  Obama says on his involvement with ACORN: "The only involvement I've had with ACORN was I represented them alongside the U.S. Justice Department in making Illinois implement a motor voter law that helped people get registered at DMV's."  Obama purposely omits the above $800,000.00 given to ACORN by his campaign making his debate statement objectively false.  He purposely omits the $230.000.00 given to ACORN by the Woods Foundation when he sat on the board of that foundation with terrorist William Ayers.  That makes his debate statement objectively false.  He purposely omits the training he himself supplied to ACORN workers in the past.  That also makes his debate statement objectively false.
 
Now, metaphorically, in the dark of night, in the 11th hour of the campaign, when the 10's of millions of people he fraudulently deceived are not looking, he admits the fraud, and lying, by quietly amending his campaign spending report. I particularly love the talking point the Obama campaign has ready (McCain returned some money to some contributor) and the media will happily barf up this obvious misdirection to the public.
 
Update:  Joe Biden also denies the ACORN connection confirmed by the amendment to Obama's campaign finance report.  See the video:
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (12) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oback Arama - Vote Early and Often

I'm Oback Arama and I'm running for President.  When you go to the polls. remember to vote early and vote often, expecially in Ohio and Florida.  As you pull the lever for me, remember that I am the candidate of hope and change, and change that works for you, and change that you can use, and real change not like the last eight years.  Also remember that I will send you a check from the U.S. government of Oback Arama even if you don't work.  And if you need an abortion, I will pay for it personally with other peoples' money so that you don't have to be punished with a baby.
 
I will do all of these things and I will, in addition, be holding a drawing of all ballots cast for me for several prizes.  First prize will be a ride on the Oback Air Force One flying fortress, second prize will be a ride in my bullet proof Oback mobile presidential limosine, and third prize will be an autographed picture of future pardonee Tony Rezko, without whose "quiet" help, I might be heading for the Big House, instead of the White House.  Remember that your right to vote is a precious gift from past patriots of this country, and your right to vote a second time, third time, fourth time and fifth or more time is a precious gift from ACORN due to the generous donation of 800,000 greenbacks that I, Oback Arama provided to that wonderful non-partisan, non-profit group.
 
So feel the love, and vote for the Oback Arama Nation of United States.  It will be a glorious journey of four years of social progress and I want you on board the hope and change express.  Can we do it?
 
Yes we can!  Yes we can!  Yes we can!
 
I'm Oback Arama ahd I approved this message.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Energy Talking points for Sarah and John

  • Democrats want to take your money and then give it back to you so that you can buy gas and heating oil. They are deliberately blocking oil drilling to keep gas and energy prices high.
     
  • Republicans want to drill for more oil in order to make gas and heating oil cheaper. 
     
  • The Republican program promotes your freedom.  The Democrat program promotes your servitude to the Democrats.
     
  • When you fill your gas tank and see the pump spinning past $50, think this:  The Democrats are blocking our ability to drill for more oil.
  • when speaking of energy always refer to the “John McCain all-of-the above energy development program.”

Background

What have the Democrats done to promote more oil and cheaper gas?  Blocked drilling on the OCS.  Blocked drilling in ANWR.  Blocked development of oil shale.  Promoted windfall profits on our private oil companies so they cannot compete with huge foreign state owned oil companies.  They are actively destroying attempts to produce more supply through their policies and programs.  Result:  Everything costs more due to the centrality of oil to our economy.  Gasoline and diesel cost $3.50 or more at the pump.  Industries dependent on high energy consumption like the travel, trucking, air lines, and heavy manufacturing are seeing permanent destruction to their businesses.  Small businesses and large companies are forced to lay off employees because of to a reduction of revenue and an increase in expenses due to escalating energy costs.

What about Republicans? 
McCain: Pushed for drilling on the OCS. Supports an all of the above energy program: Pushed for oil shale development.  Supports building multiple nuclear power plants.  Supports hybrid vehicles.  Supports coal-to-liquid technology.  Supports clean coal power plants. Supports compressed clean natural gas for transportation. Supports solar and wind energy development. Everything will cost less with the programs promoted by the McCain plan.
 
Palin: Coordinated and managed the approval of the contract to  build a $40 billion natural gas pipeline to bring trillions of cubic feet of gas through Canada to the lower 48 states. Got more oil flowing from the Alaskan North Slope by breaking up the monopoly of private oil companies in her position as Governor. Supports drilling in ANWR. Fully supports the “John McCain all-of-the above energy development program.” Result: Everything will cost less including gasoline and heating oil.

http://www.ogj.com/display_article/340954/132/ARTCL/none/none/There's-little-celebration-as-OCS-leasing-moratoriums-expire/?dcmp=OGJ.monthly.pulse
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oback and Infanticide

 Barack Obama abortion infanticide
 
I'm Oback Arama, and this is the last time I will address the issue of abortion and quote, infanticide, unquote, until I address it the next time.   Many are criticizing my 4 votes against providing health care to products of conception accidently born alive during an abortion.  Why people have a love affair with products of conception is beyond my ability to conceive.  Ha!  Ha!  You know, I went back and checked my record on these votes, because I was sure that I must have voted present at least once on this issue, but not so.
 
Now, we all have heard the old philosophical question, "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound?"  Well, I ask you a similar philosophical question, "If a breathing product of conception with a heart beat dies in a dirty linen closet, and it doesn't get health care, does that make it a person with rights?"  Due to the fact that this question may be above my pay grade, I must be very careful about my answer.  Firstly, I don't pretend to know for sure if these things are living persons with rights, so the safest way to deal with them is to be as careful as possible to protect the right to choose and just assume that they are not human beings.  Therefore, if it's not human, it's not infanticide.  Secondly, I don't want people to twist my words and spread lies saying that I don't support universal, free, Cuban style health care.  But if you put this pre-viable fetus thing in the closet, and of its own accord it ceases to have a heart beat, and stops breathing, and no one is there to see it, really, who cares?  We must at all costs protect the sacred holy right enshrined in the constitution through the Roe vs. Wade decision.  I'm not one to blow my own horn, but it took a great deal of courage for me to lead my party on this issue by denying health care to the born unborn.  Now, as I feared, politically motivated, petty people are attempting to use this against my humanitarian health care initiatives.  But, I stood up when faced with that dangerous political decision, and hit the no button on four different occasions, and protected the sacred right of every woman and brave abortionist to snuff out, by neglect, accidently born alive, breathing human blobs of tissue with heart beats.
 
I hope that I have cleared up any doubts about what I believe and what I have courageously done to show my compassionate, sensitive actions on behalf of human rights and I hope my opponents will now stop these empty personal attacks that never fed a hungry child.  We need to get back now to the central issues of this campaign, like change and hope, and change you can use, and change that works for you, and real change, not change of the last eight years.  I hope that my life issues positions will encourage you to support the coming glorious United States of Oback Arama Nation, by voting for me for President, and not for that old Navy flyer guy.
 
I'm Oback Arama and I approved this message.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BornAliveTruth.org
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pelosi Drilling Scam

Read the below linked article from the Institute for Energy Research.  The Pelosi "compromise" drilling bill is a sham and a scam.  It allows drilling only where there is little oil.  It institutes a permanent ban on drilling on the OCS out to 50 miles replacing the current annually renewable moratorium.  It continues the ban in the eastern Gulf of Mexico.  It lifts the ban beyond 100 miles.  States may opt-in to drilling between 50-100 miles by enacting state law. 
 
This bill is a pig with no lipstick and must be denounced as such.  GOP Congressmen and Senators must allow the moratorium expire at the end of the month.
 
http://www.instituteforenergyresearch.org/2008/09/11/no-energy-nancys-new-energy-plan/
 
 

Countdown Clocks at WishAFriend.com
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Cannot Define Victory

Is this statement even remotely plausible?  The candidate who wants a 16 month withdrawal time table regardless of the circumstances on the ground accuses the other candidate of attempting to "snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?
 
 
 
The question from Stefanopoulous is simple.  Define victory.  I believe that he could define victory with respect to his campaign but it again seems that victory for his country is not definable. 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nothing Comes From Nothing

Charles Krauthammer says in a column today that McCain has forfeited the experience weapon against Obama by choosing Sarah Palin.
 
 
I disagree.  The selection of Palin does not negate the inexperience issue for Obama. In fact, his executive inexperience is brought into focus and accentuated by her superior executive experience. McCain has cleverly opened a two front war on Obama/Biden. Obama cannot defend his executive inexperience, only rationalize it. It will not go away and will continue to dog him. Now he must defend his empty "change and hope" position at the same time. I say empty because he has no concrete "change" record to substantiate his rhetoric. He will be on the defensive from now to November with no weapon but his empty platitudes.  As Maria sang in The Sound of Music, "Nothing comes from nothing, nothing ever could", and that is all that Obama has to offer with his vacuous legislative, and executive record. 
 
McCain's surrogates including Giuliani, Thompson, Huckabee, Romney, and Palin must pound hard on both fronts over the next 60 days and keep Obama/Biden stuttering in defense.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (8) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Drilling Letter From Russ Carnahan (D-MO 3rd Dist)


 
I must say that the Democrats are on message and on talking points when they contact their constituents.  I am just about convinced that they think the citizens of this country are a bunch of morons.  They have been puting out the exact same talking points for the last 37 days since President Bush lifted the executive drilling ban. Anyone who thinks that Pelosi, Reid, and company are going to allow a true vote on drilling needs to read this letter that was just received today.  This is their true position and the poor,  the middle class, working Americans, and retired folks can just "eat cake" as far as they're concerned.  It's damn the drilling, full speed ahead on pipe dream alternative energy and those "hundreds of thousands of good paying green jobs."  It used to be millions; what happened?
 
 
A Message From Congressman Russ Carnahan‏
From: CongressmanCarnahan@mail.house.gov
Sent: Wed 8/20/08 6:40 PM

Dear  

Thank you for contacting me in regard to America's energy needs. I appreciate hearing from you and I welcome the chance to respond.

 When talking with people here in Missouri, I repeatedly hear about the pain at the pump. I, like you, grimace every time I fill up my gas tank.

 In order to address this energy crisis, we need to fundamentally change the way America powers itself. While the United States has almost 3 percent of the world's oil reserves, we use 24 percent of the world's oil. We have more oil wells than any other country on Earth. And no matter how many more we drill, we will never again pump as much as we did during the1970s. In fact, our oil production peaked around 1970. Since 2000, the number of wells drilled on land has climbed about 66 percent - from 3,000 to nearly 5,000 - while the price of gasoline has more than doubled since 2001. Even self-described oilman, T. Boone Pickens said, "This is one emergency we can't drill our way out of." I agree with this statement, and believe that we must address the root of the problem - America's addiction to oil. With high gas prices crippling the American economy, this country needs a long-term energy plan to lower gas prices, make American more secure, create green jobs, and combat climate change.

 While I am not against domestic drilling, I am against giving oil and gas companies more drilling rights, whether in ANWR, on the Outer Continental Shelf, or elsewhere on U.S. soil, when they are not drilling on the land currently available to them. I voted in favor of a bill to require the oil companies to drill on the 68,000,000 acres federal land that is already leased to them for drilling. Moreover, the areas with the vast majority of oil and gas are already open to drilling. According to federal government surveys, 82 percent of the area which contains natural gas in the outer continental shelf and 79 percent of the outer continental shelf with oil is available for leasing. Significantly, this was before Congress opened more space for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico in 2006.

 While Americans are spending record amounts at the pump, oil companies are raking in record profits. This past quarter, the top 5 oil companies posted a combined profit of $44 billion in second quarter profits - up 42 percent more than last year. And this year, profits for the top five oil companies are projected to top $160 billion - far exceeding last year's record of $123 billion. Since 2001, the major oil companies have amassed close to $600 billion in profits. These record profits are not being used to invest in alternative and renewable energy, nor are they being used in such a way as to offset the price of gas for consumers. For example, in 2007, ExxonMobil spent only $10 million on renewable energy.

 I believe we need to seek out short-term solutions to bring prices down while developing a long-term strategy to power our future with less oil. We have not sufficiently harnessed our renewable natural resources. Since coming to Congress, I have been working hard for all of my constituents to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, bring down record gas prices, and launch a cleaner, smarter energy future for America that lowers costs and creates hundreds of thousands of good paying green jobs.

 In the short term, I, and other members of Congress, have been calling on President George Bush to release oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which is almost filled to capacity. This has a proven track record of reducing the price of oil within weeks. When President Bush released a small portion from the Reserve in 2005, the price of oil dropped 9.1 percent.

 While continuing to advocate for immediate relief at the pump, I have advocated for increased utilization of our enormous natural gas reserves, as we transition into a low carbon economy. In order to make this transition, we need more investment renewable energy such as solar, wind, hydro, geothermal and biomass waste, while upgrading our transmission power grid, so that more energy gets from its source to its destination without losing it. We can fund these bold renewable energy investments by repealing billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies for oil companies that are raking in record profits. Lastly, we must curb excessive oil speculation that is causing major market disturbances which prevent the market from accurately reflecting the forces of supply and demand in the energy commodity market.

 In the coming weeks, Congress will continue to debate energy solutions to bring real relief to American families. Please know that I will continue to support and encourage legislation that will lower energy costs, decrease our dependence on foreign oil and protect our environment. Once again, thank you for contacting me. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future on this or any other issue of concern.

 
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama, Qualified to Command?

Having personally worked as an airline pilot for 31 years, I can assure you that every pilot watches every other pilot closely every flight. Flight instructors evaluate pilot performance to a strict standard. One of the unwritten principles that most every airline pilot uses when evaluating other pilots is embodied in the question: “Would you put your spouse and children on a flight commanded by that pilot?” If the answer is an unequivocal “yes”, the pilot passes: if “no” or “I’m not sure,” the pilot does not pass.

Let me ask you two hypothetical questions. Would you put your wife and children on an airplane piloted by Barack Obama? Would you put your spouse and children on an airplane piloted by John McCain? If you answered “yes” to either of these questions, I must question your commitment to the continued survival of your family. We know that Obama has no experience as a pilot and although McCain was once a pilot, I seriously doubt that he is current in flight proficiency.  

I remember the comedic movie “Airplane” where the pilots of an airliner in flight become disabled by food poisoning and a former pilot riding as a passenger is summoned to the cockpit to bring the plane to a somewhat safe landing. Innumerable jokes and gags permeate the story but one gag that isn’t explored is to ask a non- pilot to the cockpit to bring the plane in safely.   In the sequel to the movie “Airport” titled “Airport 1975”, which is an unintentionally funny movie, the pilots of an airliner are disabled by a midair collision with a light aircraft. Unfortunately there are no pilots aboard and a ridiculous air to air transfer of a pilot is accomplished to bring the plane home safely. In both cases, a real pilot is written into the story to bring the plane home safely. The reason for this is obvious: Even in a comedy, no one in the audience with half a brain is going to believe that an inexperienced non-pilot could bring a big airliner into an airport safely.

What if the above situation occurred in real life and the pilots of your flight were disabled. McCain and Obama are the only ones on the flight available to fly the airplane.  You must choose one of the two to pilot the plane. Who do you choose? Would anyone in his right mind choose Obama?  He’s never flown an airplane. He wouldn’t have a clue as to how to safely put an airliner on a runway. McCain was a Naval Aviator and a proficient pilot in his past. Although he has no experience flying an airliner, he could at least keep the plane right side up and would have a decent chance of bringing the plane home safely. Experience here is the key to making your choice.

One of the primary jobs of the U.S. President is Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.     What kind of experience do the two candidates have with respect to the Armed Forces?

John McCain

 McCain grew up in a military family. His father and grandfather were both four star admirals in the U.S. Navy. He lived the Navy life from birth to his retirement from the Navy in 1981. McCain spent 23 years in the Navy as a commissioned officer and retired with the rank of captain which is equivalent to a colonel in the Army. He was a decorated naval aviator and a prisoner of war. He was the commander of a naval training squadron that won a Meritorious Unit Commendation. He attended the National War College.   He served as the U.S. Navy’s liaison to the U.S. Senate. McCain is the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee. Much more can be said about McCain’s military experience but it is indisputable that he has a well rounded perspective having spent more than 45 years on the inside of the military as a navy dependent and a member of the navy, and more than 26 years as a civilian legislator participating in crafting legislation and reviewing policies affecting the military. 

Barack Obama

Obama serves on the Senate Veteran Affairs Committee. Obama has no direct or indirect military experience.

Some say that McCain has an edge in this category. This isn’t just an edge; it’s more like the New York Yankees against the worst middle school girls softball team in the country.  It’s difficult to understand how anyone in their right mind could say that Barack Obama is remotely qualified to be Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces. Obama and his supporters may talk about how smart he is and what a quick study he is and what a great organizer he is, but when it comes down to experience, he is less than a neophyte on military matters. Generals like Wesley Clark may endorse him but he is still stuck with a deficient background.  Our military service is an all volunteer force but he chose to serve elsewhere. I might say that if you had a non-military person who had served in the houses of Congress for twenty-five or thirty years on military oversight committees, you might make an argument for that person for the position of Commander-in-Chief. Obama hasn’t even completed one term in the Senate. His bid for Commander-in-Chief is a bridge too far and a potential disaster. I don’t care who his Vice President is or who his Defense Secretary is. The President will be the commander and the last word on all things military. The Democratic Party has irresponsibly nominated an incompetent person for the job. We cannot allow this man to become Commander-in-Chief any more than we could allow him to fly an airliner with our family aboard.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) is a Crock

It's a little far fetched and a lot opportunistic for Sen. Sherrod Brown to blame a merger in 2003 for lost jobs in 2008-09.  It's been five years since Airborne shareholders approved the DHL merger with 88% of the votes cast.  What has the US Senator been doing since elected by Ohio as Senator?  For one thing, he's a Democrat who supports bans on domestic oil production.  That stance has resulted in a $700 billion per year contribution to our balance of payments deficit and the resultant necessity for foreign entities to put those dollars to work investing in and acquiring US companies.  Anheuser Busch was recently acquired by InBev due to this growing situation. 

Twenty years of enviromania has pumped not oil but the price of oil to levels that are forcing energy reliant companies such as airlines, trucking, and automakers to make tough decisions on layoffs, cutbacks in operations and outsourcing.  The DHL-Airborne merger stayed the the demise of Airborne that was being caused by crushing competition with FedEx and UPS. The DHL-Airborne merger saved jobs for a time but the escalation of oil prices has now driven a stake through the heart of Airborne and may do the same with other airlines, not to mention trucking companies, automakers, and other manufacturing entities.  What does the illustrious big mouthed Senator do to provide relief to American workers?  He votes no on drilling for oil.  The Plain-Dealer quotes him as saying, "The notion that we can drill our way out of this mess is a crock and cop-out. There's no there, there."  He no doubt thinks we can inflate our tires out of this situation like his buddy Oback Arama.  Take your dictionary and pencil in another definition for "crock": Sherrod Brown.  He is no more than a conniving politician who thinks he can trick the working people of Ohio into believing his deceptive nonsense.

It has now been 24 days since President Bush released the ban on Outer Continental Shelf, ANWR, and other drilling and production of oil.  How many more companies will have to be shuttered, how many jobs lost, and how much pain will it take until the Democrats of Reid, Pelosi, and Sherrod Brown say no to enviromania and yes to the American people?  The days of vacation for no-drill Democrats must end or we must put them on a permanent vacation in November.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain Pulls Ahead in Election and Energy

Rasmussen Reports says that McCain has now pulled ahead of Obama in it's daily tracking poll when "leaners" are included 47% to 46%.
Rasmussem said "This is the first time McCain has enjoyed even a statistically insignificant advantage of any sort since Obama clinched the Democratic nomination on June 3."
 
 
McCain is now trusted more by voters on energy issues 46% to 42%.  Obama held a four point lead just 2 months ago according to Rasmussen.
 
 
 
It's nice to see McCain in the lead.  It seems like the recent push on OCS drilling has moved public opinion in McCain's favor on the energy issues.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bubble Trouble?

We’ve all heard about the famous tulip bubble back in the 1600’s and of course the Tech bubble at the beginning of this century. Most recently we’ve experienced the housing bubble. What they have in common is that each bubble resulted in the economic crash of its over inflated market. Back in January, 2001, AOL bought and merged with Time Warner. After the merger, shareholders in AOL received more shares in the new company than the shareholders in Time Warner recieved. AOL had made a timely trade of their stock at a point close to the top of the tech bubble. Two years later AOL Time Warner took a 99 billion dollar write off due to the devaluation of the assets that AOL had brought to the merger. The CEO of AOL, Steve Case, had, in retrospect, pulled off the first big deal (steal?) of the 21st century by trading over inflated AOL stock for the truly valuable stock of Time Warner. 

The bubble I’m thinking about today isn’t economic, but it has things in common with an economic bubble. It’s a “commodity” that has a word of mouth buzz about it. Its market value has been bid up far beyond its underlying value. The underlying fundamentals of the “commodity” are characterized by a lot of hot air and not much foundation, and the “commodity” hasn’t been around for very long. Although stock of the commodity has a low intrinsic value, an army of salesmen is attempting to convert this overinflated stock into a much more valuable position. It is reminiscent of the AOL –Time Warner merger.  The “commodity”, of course, is the expected Democrat nominee, and the valuable position is the presidency.

I’ve heard economists declare that all bubbles eventually burst and that over inflated stocks always come down in price. The big question is how long can the main stream media and the Democrat hot air machine keep the Obama bubble inflated? This is probably just wishful thinking, and I don’t have much of anything to base it on, but the Obama bubble could be about to burst. After all of the favorable press from the fawning media and the over-hyped Obama international tour, Obama has received a bump in the polls. If the bump fades in the coming week, it may mean that Obama fatigue is setting in with the public. Time will tell, but we can have hope that things will change and that the Obama bubble will deflate by November. Now that’s the kind of hope and change that works for me.

Rasmussen daily tracking:

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/daily_presidential_tracking_poll

Gallup daily tracking:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/109099/Gallup-Daily-Obama-Retains-Lead-48-41.aspx

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lift the Ban or Face the Consequences

At 9:18 AM this morning, the US Senate Republicans set in place their promised blockade of any Senate legislation that did not include lifting of the congressional moratorium on oil drilling off shore and in other areas.  President George W. Bush led the drive for more drilling on July 14, 2008 by lifting the executive order that had established a similar moratorium.  A blockade in international relations is considered an act of war and this legislative blockade led by Mitch McConnell, the Senate minority leader may be considered a legislative act of war.  It is a welcome response to the numerous blockades that have been established by Senators Pinky (his real nickname) Reid, Dick Durbin, and  other co-conspirators against administration nominees and initiatives.  This is a development that has the potential to change the tide of power in the halls of Congress, because the Republican caucus is on the right side of the issue, and on the same side as an overwhelming majority of the American people.  This is a majority of people whose composition crosses party lines lines, cultural lines, and economic lines.  We must take a no compromise position.  We must demand that the Republicans hold their ground because of the importance of drilling to the security of our nation, our families, our jobs and our way of life. 

It has been ten days since President Bush provided the leadership on this issue and the two branches of Congress led by the Democrats, Senator Reid and Congressperson Pelosi have done absolutely nothing in a practical sense to lift the ban on drilling and give the people of this nation relief from skyrocketing energy prices.  President Bush's action caused futures market speculators to reassess their risk and reduce their long positions in energy, resulting in a drop in energy prices. If and when the congressional Democrats bend to the desires of the majority of Americans and lift the drilling ban we will see another drop in prices because investors will again reassess risk and reduce their long positions. Longer term when more oil and gas enters the energy supply lines, prices will be further reduced. What is it that is more important for Congress to do than lift the drilling ban?  How can it be more important for Congress to go on their August recess than to lift the drilling ban?  The Democrat leaders love to tell us how they feel our pain.  I see no evidence of that from the Democrats when they plan to go on vacation before lifting the drilling ban.  Tomorrow will be eleven days that Congress has not acted.  How many more days will it take.  Every day that the Democrats fail to act is another day of money hemorrhaging from our wallets and from our national treasury.  It is a day closer to when another American will lose his job, a day closer to a winter when an American will be unable to pay his heating bill.  Don't give us this garbage about throwing out everyone in Congress if no action is taken.  The ball is in the Democrat court and their power is on the line.  Act or be acted upon.
 
See how your Senator voted at this link.  A yea vote was a vote against lifting the drilling ban.  In my state of Missouri, Bond voted for lifting the ban, and McCaskill voted against lifting the ban.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oback and Stopped Clocks

Would someone please enlighten me as to how anyone can declare Obama correct about Iraq without laughing out loud? Here is a guy who introduced legislation back on January 30, 2007 that would have withdrawn all combat troops from Iraq to be completed by March 31, 2008. That computes out to 16 months. He has, to the best of my knowledge, not wavered from that number since. So, from where did this military genius pluck the number 16, and why, with all that has happened since January 30, 2007, has the number not been adjusted?

 A stopped clock reads the correct time twice a day. The alleged  agreement of Prime Minister Al Malaki to the 16 month withdrawal number is no more than a stopped clock coincidence. Six months ago when Oback was declaring a 16 month withdrawal, was he correct? NO. Was he correct 5 months ago, or 3 months ago, or 8 months ago or 4 months, 5 days, 13 minutes and 12 seconds ago? NO. Please deliver me from these pompous goofy liberal pundits who say that McCain, Malaki, and others are following Obama’s lead and endorsing his withdrawal timetable. The clock has been running ever since he introduced his irresponsible piece of legislation back in 2007, and he has been consistently wrong every moment since then, including right now. The time for withdrawal will come when the conditions on the ground and the political situation in Iraq dictate withdrawal, not when an inexperienced community organizer from south Chicago plucks a number from a place where the sun don’t shine.

Obama Bill Sets Date For Troop Withdrawal

Http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/30/AR2007013001586.html?nav=emailpage
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »